RBA Stock Study (3-30-23)

I recently did a stock study on Ritchie Bros Auctioneers Inc. (RBA) with a closing price of $55.42.

M* writes:

     > Ritchie Bros. operates the world’s largest marketplace for
     > heavy equipment. The company started as a live auctioneer
     > of industrial equipment, since then it has greatly expanded
     > its operations to include the sale of construction,
     > agricultural, oilfield, and transportation equipment. Ritchie
     > Bros. operates over 40 live auction sites in more than 12
     > countries, along with online marketplaces, including
     > IronPlanet, Marketplace-E, and GovPlanet. Its agricultural
     > auctions are frequently much smaller venues and can include
     > liquidations of single farms. The company holds over 300
     > auctions yearly and sells $6 billion worth of equipment.

This medium-sized company has grown sales and EPS at annualized rates of 18.1% and 10.7% over the last decade. Lines are generally up and parallel except for EPS declines in ’14, ’16, ’17, and ’21. PTPM has remained above peer and industry averages declining from 28.8% in ’13 to 12.7% in ’17 and rebounding to 23.4% in ’22. Last-5-year average is 16.5%.

Over the last 10 years, ROE has been relatively stable except for a spike in ’22 to 25.6%. ROE has remained mostly above peer and industry averages with a last-5-year average of 18%. Debt-to-Capital over the decade has generally been lower than the industry but higher than peer averages with a last-5-year average of 47.5%. Quick Ratio is 0.86, and Interest Coverage is 8. Value Line rates the company B++ for Financial Strength. M* gives a Standard rating for Capital Allocation, writing “the company’s low balance sheet risk is largely due to its manageable debt levels and access to credit lines.”

I forecast long-term annualized sales growth of 10% based on the following:

• CNN Business projects 94.1% YOY and 55.3% per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (based on 8 analysts).
• YF projects YOY 97.9% and 20.3% for ’23 and ’24, respectively (7 analysts).
• Zacks projects YOY 80.3% and 30.3% for ’23 and ’24, respectively (2).
• Value Line projects 11.1% annualized growth from ’21-’26.
• CFRA gives an ACE of 98% YOY and 54.3% per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (6).
• M* offers a 2-year ACE of 80.8% annualized growth.

The lofty growth rates over the next two years are probably due to acquisition of U.S. auto retailer IAA Inc., which completed on March 20 (see here).

I forecast long-term annualized EPS growth of 6% based on the following:

• CNN Business projects contraction of 1.7% YOY for ’23, 8.4% growth per year for ’22-’24 (based on 8 analysts), and 5-year annualized growth of 7%.
• MarketWatch projects growth of 3% YOY and 10.9% per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (8 analysts).
• Nasdaq.com projects 11.1% YOY growth for ’24 [2 and 1 analyst(s) for ’23 and ’24].
• Seeking Alpha projects 4-year annualized growth of 7%.
• YF projects YOY growth of 3.7% and 13.6% for ’23 and ’24, respectively (8), along with 7% annualized growth for the next five years.
• Zacks projects YOY growth of 4.6% and 15.1% for ’23 and ’24, respectively (3), along with 7% annualized growth for the next five years.
• Value Line projects 14.1% annualized growth from ’21-’26.
• CFRA projects contraction of 18.5% YOY and 0.9% per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (3).

I am not seeing any bump in estimated EPS for ’23-’24 like I did with sales.

I find it odd that four of five long-term estimates are identical. CNN Business and Seeking Alpha get data from Factset and S&P Global, respectively. YF gets data from Refinitiv, and Zacks is its own data source. Given all different sources, I would not expect duplication unless multiple sources are getting estimates from the same analysts. Even at that, this isn’t a case like others I’ve seen where the number of analysts is next to none: CNN Business, YF, and Zacks are citing 8, 8, and 3.

I am forecasting EPS growth just below the long-term range (mean of 5 estimates: 8.4%).

My Forecast High P/E is 24. Over the last 10 years, high P/E has ranged from 24.3 in ’15 to 56 in ’21 with a last-5-year average of 40. I am forecasting below the range.

My Forecast Low P/E is 15. Over the last 10 years, low P/E has ranged from 16.8 in ’20 to 37.2 in ’21 with a last-5-year average of 24.2. I could forecast below the range with 16, but the resultant Low Stock Price Forecast would only be 17.4% below the previous close [rule of thumb is 20%]. I am forecasting even lower.

My Low Stock Price Forecast is the default value of $42.90. This is 22.6% less than the previous closing price and 11.9% less than the 52-week low.

Over the last 10 years, Payout Ratio has ranged from 36.4% in ’22 to 98.6% in ’17 (possibly an upside outlier) with a last-5-year average of 55.8%. I am forecasting just below the range at 36%.

These inputs land RBA in the HOLD zone with an U/D ratio of 2.9. The Total Annualized Return (TAR) is 13%.

PAR (using Forecast Average—not High—P/E) is 9%, which is less than I seek for a medium-size company. If a healthy margin of safety (MOS) anchors this study, then I will use TAR instead.

To assess MOS, I compare my inputs with those of Member Sentiment (MS). Based on only 14 studies done (7 studies with outliers excluded) in the past 90 days, mean averages for projected sales growth, projected EPS growth, Forecast High P/E, Forecast Low P/E, and Payout Ratio are 9.2%, 9.9%, 35, 23, and 61.2%. I am lower on everything except sales growth. MS high and low EPS are $3.92 and $2.09 compared to my $3.83 and $2.86. My low EPS may be greater than MS because EPS jumped 110% in ’22 and some studies use the ’21 number (with ’22 not yet completed). My high EPS is less due to a lower forecast growth rate (I’m surprised the difference isn’t larger). MS has a Low Stock Price Forecast of $36.10. This is 15.9% lower than mine although the default MS low price would be higher: 23 * $2.09 = $48.07. Value Line projects an average annual P/E of 25 compared to MS 29 and my 19.5.

A robust MOS underlies this study, and I would be a buyer under $55/share.

LFUS Stock Study (3-29-23)

I recently did a stock study on Littelfuse Inc. (LFUS) with a closing price of $257.96.

M* writes:

     > Littelfuse is a primary provider of circuit protection products
     > (such as fuses and relays) into the transportation, industrial,
     > telecommunications, and consumer electronics end markets. The
     > firm is also increasing its power semiconductor business, where
     > it predominantly serves industrial end markets and is breaking
     > into electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

This medium-sized company has grown sales and EPS at annualized rates of 13.6% and 13.8%, respectively, over the last decade. Lines are generally up and parallel with sales declines in ’19 and ’20 along with EPS declines in ’15, ’19, and ’20. PTPM has been cyclical over the last decade above peer and industry averages with a last-5-year average of 13.6%.

Over the last 10 years, ROE has been cyclical and above peer and industry averages with a last-5-year average of 12.3%. Debt-to-capital over the decade has generally been lower (higher) than industry (peer) averages with a last-5-year average of 30.6%. Value Line rates the company B++ for Financial Strength. M* gives a Standard rating for Capital Allocation, writing that the company has “a sound balance sheet, based on low net debt.” Quick Ratio is 1.5, and Interest Coverage is 17.9.

I forecast long-term annualized sales growth of 4% based on the following:

• CNN Business projects a 4% YOY contraction and 2% growth per year for ’23 and ’22-’24 (based on 8 analysts).
• YF projects YOY 2.5% contraction and 6.4% growth for ’23 and ’24, respectively (6 analysts).
• Zacks projects YOY 3.4% contraction and 5.9% growth for ’23 and ’24, respectively (3).
• Value Line projects 4.1% annualized growth from ’22-’27.
• CFRA gives an ACE of 2.4% YOY contraction and 2.1% growth per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (7).
• M* offers a 2-year ACE of 3.3% annualized growth along with 5.6% growth for the next five years in its analyst note.

I forecast long-term annualized EPS growth of 4% based on the following:

• CNN Business projects contraction of 24.7% YOY and 7.4% per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (based on 8 analysts), along with 5-year annualized growth of 12%.
• MarketWatch projects contraction of 24.4% YOY and 7.2% per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (8 analysts).
• Nasdaq.com projects 14.6% YOY growth for ’24 (4).
• Seeking Alpha projects 4-year annualized growth of 8.5%.
• YF projects YOY contraction of 24.3% and 15.7% growth for ’23 and ’24, respectively (7), along with 10.3% annualized growth for the next five years.
• Zacks projects YOY 25.6% contraction and 14.6% growth for ’23 and ’24, respectively (4), along with 12% annualized growth for the next five years.
• Value Line projects 0.6% annualized growth from ’22-’27.
• CFRA projects contraction of 14.5% YOY and 0.5% per year for ’23 and ’22-’24, respectively (7).
• M* provides long-term ACE of 9% annualized growth.

Value Line is a downside outlier of six long-term EPS projections. Its left-margin table says 14.5% annualized from ’20-’22 to ’26-’28, but I can’t get this from numbers in the statistical array. Per the latter, 4.7% annualized growth is projected from 2021 through 2027 (my interpretation of ’26-’28). I will use the 4.7% in place of 0.6% and forecast conservatively toward the lower end of the range (mean of long-term estimates using the 0.6% for Value Line is 9.1%).

To counter the argument that my forecast is unreasonably low, I would also point out that earnings have spiked 68.1% per year over the last two years. Whenever this happens, my gut tells me [for one reason or another] time will be needed in order to digest the hefty gains.

My Forecast High P/E is 21. High P/E went from 24.1 in ’13 to 48.5 in ’20 before heading down to 21.9 in ’22. The last-5-year average is 34.6. I am forecasting below the range.

My Forecast Low P/E is 13. Low P/E went from 15.3 in ’13 to 28.2 in ’17 before heading down to 12.9 in ’22. The last-5-year average is 20.7. I am forecasting near the bottom of the range (only ’22 is lower).

My Low Stock Price Forecast is the default value of $194.20. This is 24.7% below the previous closing price and 1% above the 52-week low.

Over the last 10 years, Payout Ratio has ranged from 15.1% in ’22 to 36.3% in ’20 with a last-5-year average of 25.2%. I am forecasting just below the range at 15%.

These inputs land LFUS in the HOLD zone with an U/D ratio of 1.9. The Total Annualized Return (TAR) is 8.9%.

PAR (using future average—not high—P/E) is 4.6%, which is less than I seek for a medium-size company. If a healthy margin of safety (MOS) anchors this study, however, then I will focus on the TAR rather than PAR.

To assess MOS, I compare my inputs with those of Member Sentiment (MS). Based on 205 studies done in the past 90 days, averages for projected sales growth, projected EPS growth, Forecast High P/E, Forecast Low P/E, and Payout Ratio are 9.3%, 9.0%, 27.0, 19.4, and 26.1%. I am much lower across the board. MS high and low EPS are $22.12 and $13.40 compared to my $18.18 and $14.94. My low EPS may be greater than MS due the latest quarterly earnings release, and my high EPS is less due to a lower forecast growth rate. MS has a Low Stock Price Forecast of $186.22, which is 4.1% lower than mine (not surprising since the stock has rallied 15% over the last three months). Value Line forecasts average annual P/E of 24 compared to MS 23.2 and my 17.

A robust MOS underlies this study, and I would be a buyer under $240/share.