What Percentage of New Traders Fail? (Part 3)
Posted by Mark on April 17, 2020 at 12:23 | Last modified: May 16, 2020 15:47Today I continue with excerpts from a Forex website forum discussion in 2013. The initial post, which tries to rebuke traditional wisdom, is Post #1 here. Forum content is unscientific and open to scrutiny. Do your own due diligence and buyer beware.
—————————
• Post #21, Jean:
> The figures don’t show by how much the accounts
> are profitable. Perhaps many are just slightly up in
> % from the start of each quarter, and perhaps all the
> slow and steady growth account holders don’t hang
> out at net forums. Maybe the “95/99% of traders
> lose” is inaccurate and really just a collective
> anger/stressed/disbelief based view of this business
> as so many guys that are both clever and dedicated
> spend years at this and don’t cash in, but spend
> a lot of time together on forums and collectively
> agree on a 95-99% figure…?
• Post #22, Slim:
> Those statistics don’t really mean much as far as
> I’m concerned. Certainly, there will be a lot of
> traders who jump in for three or four months and
> quit. That significantly reduces the “success rate”.
>
> Trading is a profession (think doctor or lawyer).
> You don’t have to go to college to be a good trader
> but you’ll get your “trading degree” one way or
> another [with tuition paid to the market].
>
> Most professionals spend years learning their
> profession. What would be the success rate of a
> surgeon after 4 months of learning? Some can
> probably be a good trader in far less time than
> it takes to be a surgeon but the idea is the same.
>
> Individual retail traders have the added burden
> of becoming entrepreneurs—like an attorney going
> into private practice rather than working for a firm.
>
> I would imagine that the success rate for traders
> who take the time to learn and decide to stick with
> it isn’t so different as the success rate for other
> businesses: ~18 – 20%. You really can’t judge the
> success/failure rate solely by the stats required
> by the CFTC.
• Post #28, Dye:
> Yet more and more people are still buying into this
> long held rumor?? based on what facts? I would like
> to see some stats other than broker numbers that
> can be manipulated just like the price. With a
> market that is so random how can we have such a
> firm number of losers to winners.
• Post #29, Cold:
> It makes no sense and I don’t buy it at all. Maybe
> not 99% but more than 70%. I’ve been in the business
> since 2003 and I can confirm from my own experience.
• Post #30, Slim:
> The fact is, PEOPLE WILL BELIEVE WHAT THEY WANT
> TO BELIEVE regardless of whether there’s anything to
> substantially support the belief.
>
> I think I would have to agree with Cold: more than
> 70% fail. However, I would like to know the success
> rate of those who have toughed it out for at least
> 3 years. I can only guess that the success rate gets
> a little better.
I wonder what Cold and Slim would think about the Brazilian day trading study?
To be continued…
Categories: Financial Literacy | Comments (0) | Permalink